“Less is More” Series Highlights Overused Medical Interventions

By Rachel Walden |

The prominent medical journal Archives of Internal Medicine has launched a new feature, “Less is More,” intended to “highlight situations in which the overuse of medical care may result in harm and in which less care is likely to result in better health.” As a freely available editorial in the current issue explains:

Across the United States, the rate of use of common medical services varies markedly, but measures of health are not better in areas where more services are provided. In fact, the opposite is true—some measures of health are worse in areas where people receive more health services.

This concept will not be unfamiliar to readers who have followed our discussions about screening mammography, continuous electronic fetal monitoring, hormone therapy, and other concerns. The Archives editorial also uses postmenopausal hormone therapy as an example of a case in which “harms have been proven to outweigh benefits.”

The current issue’s articles on this concept are focused on proton pump inhibitors (PPIs), a class of drugs used for conditions such as acid reflux and ulcers, and for which 113.4 million prescriptions are apparently filled each year. The articles, and a related editorial, discuss potential increased risk of Clostridium difficile and pneumonia infections associated with the drugs, as well as potential risks for an increased rate of spine, lower arm, and total fractures in postmenopausal women. As the PPI-focused editorial concludes:

The problem with this paradigm is that for most patients the adverse effects of PPIs outweigh the benefits. Reducing the unnecessary use of these medications will require action by both physicians and patients. As physicians, we should offer treatments other than PPIs for functional dyspepsia, prescribe short courses of PPI treatment (after disclosure of possible risks and benefits), and consider a trial of discontinuing PPI therapy in patients who are asymptomatic. Once our patients fully appreciate the adverse effects of PPIs, they themselves may prefer other treatments, including tincture of time (many cases of dyspepsia resolve on their own), behavioral changes (eg, eating smaller meals [especially before bed], weight loss, smoking cessation, stress reduction), and other nonmedical interventions (eg, raising the head of their bed).

On a broader level, the over prescription of PPIs should also remind us to critically evaluate our own treatment paradigms: “more is better” or “do no harm”?

While the “Less is More” editorial launching the series is freely available, other relevant articles in the series may be available to subscribers only. You can use this tool to find libraries near you that have this journal, or check with your local library about access to specific articles.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

5 Comments

  1. mrs spock says:

    Interesting- as a managed care nurse, I review prescription requests all day long. PPIs make up a fair portion of those requests. Many, many of the patients whose prescription claims records I have to look through, have PPIs listed in their history. Never mind the ones who buy it over the counter.

    I would like to know exactly why there is risk, and how much, of developing c diff. For those that don’t know what c diff is, think of the worst diarrhea you’ve ever had, and multiply that by a factor of 10. It is also an infection that is a major problem in many hospitals.

  2. Anne says:

    As a medical practitioner I have seen many people who have reflux that can only be controlled with PPI’s. Unfortunately most of these patients would not need these medications if they would adjust their diets. Our typical western diet is contributing to the unprecedented need for strong anti-acid drugs, along with the increased risk of diabetes, HTN and hyperlipidemia.

  3. Jamorama says:

    Loving this the post as it is in reality the sweetest on this valuable topic. I agree with your conclusions and will thirstily look forward to your upcoming updates. Saying thanks will not just be enough, for the wonderful clarity in your writing. I will at once grab your rss feed to stay informed of any updates.