Debunking the Mythical “Nine Month Abortion”

Photo: Charlotte Cooper (PP)
By Amie Newman |

At the third presidential debate last week, Donald Trump made a dramatic statement about abortion. He claimed that you can “rip the baby out of the womb” in the ninth month of pregnancy, “as late as one or two or three or four days prior to birth.”  

His statement is not based on medical or legal fact, and his claim that this happens demands a response. And that’s exactly what happened: later that night, and in the following days, there was a storm of responses from women’s health advocates and activists as well as from women who have had late-term abortions and the doctors who provide them. All were determined to set the record straight.

Dr. Jen Gunter, an OB-GYN who has performed many late-term abortions, was quick to clear things up on her blog:

Like what you're reading? Help us expand access to accurate information on health and sexuality.

Donate Today!

There are no ninth month abortions. Really. A ninth month abortion is a unicorn and so it’s ridiculous to even discuss it. Terminations after 24 weeks are for severe fetal anomalies.

So what was Trump talking about? His statement harkened back to the misleading term “partial birth abortion”  — a term that has no medical meaning but is interpreted to mean a later-term abortion. The term was coined as a political phrase in 1995 by the anti-abortion advocacy organization the National Right to Life, in an effort to prevent second trimester abortions. It’s not a medical term because there is no such thing as a partial-birth abortion, much as there is no such thing as a nine-month abortion.

In an article on, Dr. Gunter explains,

I’m a doctor who was trained to do late-term abortions. I did them for five years in residency and for 10 years in practice and I have no idea what Trump is talking about. I have even practiced in states with no gestational age limit for abortions. So while I no longer perform abortions, I know much more about this subject than Donald Trump or any of his advisers can ever hope to know.

In order to understand more about what exactly late-term abortions are, it’s helpful to know what they aren’t. They aren’t the majority of abortions in the United States. The vast majority of abortions — 91 percent — are early abortions, those performed in the first trimester (the first 13 weeks) of pregnancy. The rest, except for a tiny fraction, take place in the second trimester, at or before 26 weeks.  Late-term abortions, generally defined as those performed at or after 21 weeks of pregnancy, are rare. In fact, only 1.3 percent of abortions in the United States are performed at that stage.

Most women who have late-term abortions have them because the fetus has severe fetal anomalies (birth defects) that are often incompatible with life. Less frequently a woman has one when her own health is at risk or for “personal reasons,” such as being unable to access an abortion earlier. Behind each of these scenarios, however, exist thousands of women with their own deeply personal and nuanced experiences.

Alyson Draper, a 40-year-old Mormon woman, is one of the eighty percent of women who have later term abortions because the fetus has birth impairments. She shared her story of “the most wanted and planned pregnancy ever,” because she desperately wanted people to understand that her experience was not at all what Trump described:

I had to have a late term abortion. It was the worst moment in my life. What made it even worse was the State of Utah had made it illegal.

I had one dead twin. The other had severe Spina Bifida. It was so bad that his brain had developed outside his head, and his spine was open clear to the lumbar level. There was ZERO hope, and no medical miracle that could save him. Our dreams were shattered. These twins were from IVF. I was forty, and there would be no more pregnancies.

Draper needed a late-term abortion not only because of these circumstances, but also because her own life was at risk. Abortions to protect the health of the mother usually involve precarious situations, when a woman has a life-threatening condition like heart failure, lupus, or an infection in the uterus.

As for personal reasons why women undergo later term abortions, they are not what anti-abortion legislators like to frame as casual, flippant, or simple. It’s usually because of difficulty in finding an abortion provider who performs late-term abortions or the challenge of coming up with the out-of-pocket cost which can rise into the thousands of dollars.

While it can be politically expedient to frame late-term abortion in such graphic terms (“partial birth” or “ripped from the womb”), the reality of the procedure used is nothing like that. It is, however, surgery. And, as Dr. Gunter writes, images of surgical procedures are graphic.

The procedures used are either dilation and evacuation (D&E) or dilation and extraction (D&X). Both carry minimal risk and do not require hospitalization.

In our section on Dilation and Evacuation Abortion, we explain,

For women who have a later abortion, the most common method is dilation and evacuation (D&E), which involves removing the fetal and placental tissue with a combination of suction and instruments. A small number of second-trimester abortions are done by inducing labor with drugs, a procedure called induction abortion.

Unfortunately, because dilation and extraction has been ruled by the Supreme Court as “partial birth abortion” (again, there is no medical procedure with this name), doctors cannot use this safe method to terminate later term pregnancies.

And this is the real consequence of the language used in the third debate. It’s not only that there is no medical or legal basis for what Trump described that night. It’s that perpetuating false information can have a devastating impact on women’s health and lives. A D&X is often the safest way to help women like Alyson Draper (and so many thousands of others) in desperate need of a medical procedure they never wanted to have in the first place.

Late-term abortions, those that happen at or after 21 weeks, are rare. It’s important to debunk the myths surrounding them so that women and their partners can get the care they need and deserve.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


  1. Marcin says:

    “Late-term abortions, those that happen at or after 21 weeks, are rare.”
    With respect to author of article adjective “rare” depend from situation. When we compare amount of all abortion yes – late term abortion is rare. But if you see to disabled children, majority of them lost their life in late abortion.
    “risk or for “personal reasons,” such as being unable to access an abortion earlier.”
    If it is true, Trump is right about nine month abortion.

  2. Marcin says:

    “The other had severe Spina Bifida. It was so bad that his brain had developed outside his head, and his spine was open clear to the lumbar level. (…)These twins were from IVF.”
    I agree with you: in vitro fertilization could lead to children disability or diseases.
    “I’m a doctor who was trained to do late-term abortions. I did them for five years in residency and for 10 years in practice and I have no idea what Trump is talking about. ”
    Do you serously expect, that doctor, who perform abortion admits that he/she does such very late abortion? It would be like butchers against slaughterhouse, you know what I mean. It is obvious that she will defend in such way.

    • Shannon says:

      I consider myself to be pessimistic and have a dark view of the world, and humanity at large, but that is some fucked up shit. I believe this professional when she says that these late term abortions are handled in the the most humane way the law will allow for the betterment of all lives concerned. If her job were truly horrific and she was covering up that fact, that would be very sick and twisted. I cannot believe someone who went into medicine did so because they are a gore monger wanting to make money off the suffering of others. That idea is grotesque beyond my imagination. I suspect you need to think deeper into your perspective and consider that most people go into healthcare to help others live healthier and more productive lives, not destroy lives for 30 years. Just think about it. All you have to do is think and not jump to the immediately conclusion that anybody who doesn’t see the world the way you do is evil.

    • Tori says:

      … if it has no hope of life. then obviously it can’t survive outside the womb or is possibly already dead in there and needs to be removed so it can be buried and so the woman carrying it doesn’t die as well.. or is that not obvious to you?

    • Shannon says:

      I am unsure of that as well. Still, it is obvious to me that life that does not reach the full gestation period will not survive outside of the womb. It would be my preference that they were carefully and humanely put under, though it’s possible the law gets in the way of that… And people who are against such practices can sometimes do more harm than good and cause needless suffering.